Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sean Mack's avatar

I agree that celebrities backing unproven drugs based on anecdotal evidence to an audience of 60 million people is bad for society. However, you shouldn't be definitive and conclusive when discussing a single paper, even if it is huge and highly published. I believe that is actively harmful to any scientific discourse. It is critical to be clear about the where the evidence is pointing while acknowledging the limitations/unknowns. Science communication is super hard, but so important.

As you mentioned, this single paper does not definitely prove a causal link between that episode and the increase in prescriptions. An observational study cannot do that, no matter how good it is executed. There are certainly still discussions/arguments to be had over the true impact of a single popular episode versus the deluge of health influencers saying the same shit (or worse) on TikTok versus simply desperate cancer patients looking for any bit of hope.

Thank you for doing what you do..

No posts

Ready for more?