28 Secret Foreign Aid Deals. The State Department Won’t Let Anyone See Them.
The big picture: The Trump administration has renegotiated 28 foreign aid agreements, mostly with African countries, as part of an “America First” global health strategy. Every deal is being kept secret. Critics say money meant to fight HIV and tuberculosis is being used as leverage for unrelated concessions including mineral mining rights and deportation agreements. Zimbabwe walked away from negotiations. A government watchdog is suing for the documents. The few deals that were briefly posted online were taken down within days.
Why it matters: This is money that prevents deaths, keeps clinics open, and funds antiretroviral treatments for millions. The secrecy isn’t incidental to the strategy. If the terms were straightforward, there’d be no reason to hide them. The fact that the State Department is fighting a FOIA lawsuit and pulling documents off websites tells you the terms include things they don’t want scrutinized.
The deals: 28 agreements renegotiated under the “America First” global health strategy. Secretary of State Rubio called existing programs “deeply broken.” U.S. funding declines over five years with countries expected to increase their own health spending. The State Department says it’s about reducing dependency.
The secrecy: Every deal kept under wraps. A break from established precedent. Government watchdog Public Citizen filed a FOIA lawsuit, accusing the State Department of breaking the law. A director said disclosure is essential to understanding what the U.S. “expects, or extracts, in return.”
The leverage concerns: Zimbabwe’s president walked away, calling the talks “lopsided” and a risk to sovereignty. In Zambia, the U.S. reportedly used health aid as leverage for critical mineral mining concessions. Several countries with major HIV epidemics are simultaneously negotiating health aid and deportation agreements with the U.S. The State Department denies all of it.
The disappearing documents: Signed agreements with Kenya, Uganda, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Ethiopia were posted on a government website, apparently by accident. Taken down within days. The State Department: “That is a process fix, not a cover-up.” A University of Chicago law professor: “There is nothing in the statute” requiring all deals to be published at once.
The variation: Nigeria is reportedly being asked to rapidly increase health spending. Mozambique has lower requirements but faces total cutoff for noncompliance. The State Department: “Both sides are putting skin in the game.” BUT if every deal is different and can’t be compared, why wait until all 28 are done before releasing any?
By the numbers:
28 — foreign aid deals renegotiated (most in Africa)
5 — agreements briefly posted then removed
0 — deals publicly disclosed as of now
0 — legal requirement to publish all deals at once
The bottom line: Money that fights HIV and tuberculosis is being used as a bargaining chip in negotiations nobody’s allowed to see. The terms include demands about mining rights and deportation deals. At least one country walked away. The few agreements that were briefly public were pulled within days. AND the State Department is fighting a lawsuit rather than releasing documents. If the terms were straightforward, they wouldn’t need to hide them. People in these countries are living under agreements they can’t see, with health funding their lives depend on being leveraged for things that have nothing to do with their health.
Thanks for reading! Comment your thoughts & reactions | Share to spread the word | Follow to stay in the loop